octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49519] SparseComplexMatrix::solve numeric fac


From: Rik
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #49519] SparseComplexMatrix::solve numeric factorization
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 19:30:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0

Update of bug #49519 (project octave):

              Item Group:          WTF, Matlab?!? => Matlab Compatibility   
                  Status:                    None => Confirmed              

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #5:

I received your files correctly and can reproduce the error.  From what I can
see this is related to a factorization call in UMFPACK.

I notice that your sparse matrix, if it were converted to a full matrix, would
have number of elements greater than the 32-bit index type used by Octave. 
This may be a problem.  Just for grins, I truncated the left-hand matrix to
46e3 x 46e3.  The left division operator now works.

So, one possibility is to compile Octave from source code and use the
'--enable-64' configure option which will use 64-bit indices (and you must be
running on 64-bit HW as well).  The issue is that you also need to re-build
all of your support libraries like BLAS and LAPACK to also use 64-bit indices.
 The instructions for building a 64-bit Octave are in the manual in Appendix
E.3 if you want to try.

Since you are a commercial enterprise, you might just want to pay someone to
resolve the situation.  The founder of Octave, John W. Eaton, does this kind
of work.  See https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/commercial-support.html.

I've saved the matrices in Octave's own binary format and by using lzip I have
reduced the file size to ~7.5 MB.  This still won't upload to this report so
I've asked on the Octave-Maintainer's list as to why this is not working.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49519>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]