[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51650] b\int64(1) vs b/int64(1)
|
From: |
Ernst Reissner |
|
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #51650] b\int64(1) vs b/int64(1) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 4 Aug 2017 04:30:05 -0400 (EDT) |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0 |
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #51650 (project octave):
Ceral, this is not the answer to my question:
It is not allowed to divide by something but a scalar.
But if you do that, you may write
b/int64(1) or int64(1)\b
which shall be equivalent.
BUT IT IS NOT!
This is the bug.
What you write about b\int64(1) is another point.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51650>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/