|
From: | Kai Torben Ohlhus |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52425] eigs function regresses |
Date: | Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:13:38 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/62.0.3202.94 Safari/537.36 |
Follow-up Comment #29, bug #52425 (project octave): @Rik: The patch (file #42524) lets me go on as before. Thank you for that and please push that one as well! Most of the FORTRAN checks don't need that save&restore as they do not really compile any FORTRAN source code. Just for the files: my prior workaround (comment #26) did not work. Using "-fdefault-integer-8" within the FFLAGS causes liboctave/external/ranlib (all FORTRAN) to be compiled with INTEGER == uint64_t and messes up all RNGs that rely on 32 bit integers... It really raises some doubts about the reliability of Octave's FORTRAN heritage, but that is for another bug report. ./configure [...] F77_INTEGER_8_FLAG='-fdefault-integer-8' [...] --enable-64 [...] --with-arpack='-larpack_Octave64' [snip] checking for dseupd in -larpack_Octave64... yes checking whether the arpack library works... yes checking whether the arpack library is free of bugs... yes [snip] 64-bit array dims and indexing: yes 64-bit BLAS array dims and indexing: yes [snip] Summary: PASS 15943 FAIL 0 XFAIL (expected failure) 5 XFAIL (reported bug) 32 SKIPPED (feature) 37 Yesterday there were unnoticed errors. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52425> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |