octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57197] [MXE Octave] Printing doesn't create v


From: Markus Mützel
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57197] [MXE Octave] Printing doesn't create valid files for some formats
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 04:52:25 -0500 (EST)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:71.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/71.0

URL:
  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57197>

                 Summary: [MXE Octave] Printing doesn't create valid files for
some formats
                 Project: GNU Octave
            Submitted by: mmuetzel
            Submitted on: Sun 10 Nov 2019 10:52:22 AM CET
                Category: Plotting with OpenGL
                Severity: 3 - Normal
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Regression
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: 
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
                 Release: dev
        Operating System: Microsoft Windows

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

I'm re-uploading Pantxo's "print_coverage.m" script from bug #49718.
Running it on a current development version of Octave 6 (hg id d05d6eebde10)
on Windows, some output formats are broken. Specifically these are:
case #4 (eps) and case #5 (epsc):
no output at all
case #14 (emf) and case #15 (meta):
empty files
case #16 (fig):
invalid content

Running the same script in Octave 5.1, the results are slightly different:
case #4 (eps) and case #5 (epsc):
valid files
case #14 (emf) and case #15 (meta):
empty files
case #16 (fig):
invalid content but different from Octave 6.0


I'm also uploading the complete content of the print_test folders.

All formats are working fine for me on Ubuntu 19.04.

Wrt the failing cases #4 and #5, Dmitri wrote in bug #49718 (comment #59
there):
> The eps file has an illegal operator "setpagedevice"
> 
> See
>
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/postscript/pdfs/5002.EPSF_Spec.pdf
(page 10) 

and (comment #61 there):

> I wonder if this is ghostscript 9.50 getting more strict about it than
9.27.
> 
> Try this link:
> 
>
https://web.archive.org/web/20170818010030/http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/postscript/pdfs/5002.EPSF_Spec.pdf




    _______________________________________________________

File Attachments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 10 Nov 2019 10:52:22 AM CET  Name: print_coverage.m  Size: 2KiB  
By: mmuetzel

<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=47827>
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 10 Nov 2019 10:52:22 AM CET  Name: print_test_5.1.zip  Size: 332KiB 
 By: mmuetzel

<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=47828>
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 10 Nov 2019 10:52:22 AM CET  Name: print_test_6.0.zip  Size: 202KiB 
 By: mmuetzel

<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=47829>

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57197>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]