|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57471] streamtube.m should use surface object rather than patch object |
Date: | Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:21:58 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:74.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/74.0 |
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #57471 (project octave): I find it more logical when it comes to preserving file history to first rename "streamtube" to "ostreamtube" and then add a Matlab compatible "streamtube" function (see the attached changesets: "bug57471_ostreamtube_v2.patch" before "bug57471_streamtube_v2.patch"). I was about to push them on default. But would it be OK to push them on stable? The advantage being that we would have a Matlab compatible version of the function from the get-go and won't need to deal with compatibility issues between versions of Octave. (file #48471, file #48472) _______________________________________________________ Additional Item Attachment: File name: bug57471_ostreamtube_v2.patch Size:11 KB <https://savannah.gnu.org/file/bug57471_ostreamtube_v2.patch?file_id=48471> File name: bug57471_streamtube_v2.patch Size:18 KB <https://savannah.gnu.org/file/bug57471_streamtube_v2.patch?file_id=48472> _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57471> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |