[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57881] Resizing subplot results in disappearance of one of the plots

[Markus Mützel]

Update of bug #57881 (project octave):

                Category:                Plotting => Documentation          
                 Release:                     dev => 6.0.90                 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #5:

Looking at the input validation of "subplot", the "rows, cols, index" triplet
and the "position" property-value-pair seem to be mutually exclusive. (The
triplet takes precedence in this case.)
This also is what the Matlab documentation of that function suggests. [1]

With this modified code snippet, the layout looks like you probably expect for
me:

figure (1); clf (1)
m = 8;
pos = [ 0.07, 0, 0.92, 0.5/m];
for i = 1:m
  pos(2) = 0.95 - i * 0.91/m;
  h(i) = subplot ('position', pos);
endfor
title(h(1), 'My title')


Can you help improve the documentation of subplot to clarify this issue?

[1]: https://de.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/subplot.html

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57881>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/