|
From: | Hartmut |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59022] [octave forge] (image) test failures in blockproc.m under Octave 6.0.90 |
Date: | Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:48:45 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/80.0 |
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #59022 (project octave): In line 102 of blockproc.m we check the following: if(!isa(fun,"function_handle") && !isa(fun,"inline function") && !ischar(fun)) error("blockproc: invalid fun parameter."); endif But the class name seems to have changed from "inline function" to "inline" in Octave 6. At least I see this (in Octave 6): >> a = inline("sum(x)","x") a = <class inline> >> class(a) ans = inline Is this an intentional name change in Octave 6? Shall we just change the above code line 102 in blockproc.m to check for the new class name "inline" instead of "inline function"? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59022> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |