[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59245] Implementation of an XML interface without Java dependency

[Philip Nienhuis]

Follow-up Comment #10, bug #59245 (project octave):

RapidXML's I/O? => that was mentioned in the decision tree you referred to in
comment #5. Go to that site, scroll down to "Maximum XML Parsing Performance"
and then scroll a little more down under the RapidXL header to read this;

> One other downside with RapidXML is that it is painful for writing XML. It
requires you to do a lot of explicit memory allocation of string names in
order to build its DOM. It does provide a kind of string buffer, but that
still requires a lot of explicit work on your end. It's certainly functional,
but it's a pain to use.

But if you've already sorted it out this is obviously moot.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59245>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/