[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59532] string concatenation lacks some syntax
From: |
Hartmut |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59532] string concatenation lacks some syntax variants of Matlab |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:17:16 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/83.0 |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59532>
Summary: string concatenation lacks some syntax variants of
Matlab
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: hardy
Submitted on: Tue 24 Nov 2020 05:17:14 PM UTC
Category: Octave Function
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Matlab Compatibility
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release: 5.2.0
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Here are two "new" ways to concatenate strings. Both do work in Matlab (tested
with R2019b) but do not work currently in Octave (tested with version 5.2.0):
>> mystring = "asdf" + 1.234
mystring =
"asdf1.234"
(Here the result in Octave is just "different", it is an array of 4 doubles.
Why not 5 by the way?)
>> mystring2 = ["asdf", 1.234]
mystring2 =
1×2 string array
"asdf" "1.234"
(This just returns the first string "asdf" in Octave and skips the second
part.)
I kind of like especially the first new syntax, because it makes the following
code possible:
a=5*6;
disp("The result is:" + a);
This will probably look familiar to people using Python.
Maybe we should add those syntax variants to Octave as well?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59532>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59532] string concatenation lacks some syntax variants of Matlab,
Hartmut <=