[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60237] Differente behaviour in anonymous function handling

[Denis Sbragion]

Follow-up Comment #10, bug #60237 (project octave):

After some further testing I found a pure Octave test case where Octave 6.2
fails and 5.2 works. No oct file involvment.

The following code:


function antest()
        d = 2;
        
        function c = bm(a)
                c = a + d;
        endfunction;
        
        ancall(@(a)(bm(a)),2)
endfunction

function r = ancall(f,a)
        r = f(a) + 1;
endfunction


Works with 5.2.0, while with 6.2.0 and 6.2.1 gives:


octave:3> antest
error: 'd' undefined near line 5, column 5
error: called from
    antest>bm at line 5 column 5
    antest>@<anonymous> at line 8 column 14
    antest>ancall at line 12 column 4
    antest at line 8 column 2


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60237>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/