[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60682] betainc is inaccurate
|
From: |
Michael Leitner |
|
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60682] betainc is inaccurate |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Aug 2021 03:35:56 -0400 (EDT) |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 |
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #60682 (project octave):
As to the comparison between matlab and octave without the fix: it seems that
matlab is a bit more accurate (the jump in the result around 2^-18 seems to be
only have as large, and the deviations for x equal two to the power of an
integer are on average somewhat smaller), but there is no qualitative
difference, I would say. Yes, the fix works for b equal to one.
But I don't understand your last remark "I'm not seeing the accuracy issue".
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60682>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/