[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61129] Performance of factor(). Proposed patch attached.

[Michael Leitner]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #61129 (project octave):

I would say yes, the performance is worth the additional code. 

Consider also my attached version: it is about the same amount of additional
code, potentially slightly faster (only one invocation of primes), and perhaps
logically easier to understand, as the same algorithm is used in two stages. 

(file #51893)
    _______________________________________________________

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: patch2                         Size:1 KB
    <https://file.savannah.gnu.org/file/patch2?file_id=51893>



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61129>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/