[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab
From: |
Markus Mützel |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:56:38 -0500 (EST) |
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #61968 (project octave):
Some more comments on the patch:
+ if (! args(0).is_single_type () && ! args(0).is_double_type ())
Why not `! args(0).is_float ()`?
+ if (! args(1).is_single_type () && ! args(1).is_double_type ())
Same.
+ FloatNDArray e = args(0).float_array_value ();
Typo? Should be `args(1)` instead?
IIUC, `ov.exp2 ()` and `Fexp2 (ov)` would do two different operations. (The
former essentially calls the C function from math.h `exp2`, the latter
`ldexp`.) Is that what we want? Or do we just need to live with that
difference...
Also from https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/numeric/math/ldexp
> On many implementations, ldexp is less efficient than multiplication or
division by a power of two using arithmetic operators.
More off-topic: Why are we using C functions (like ::exp) in many cases
instead of their corresponding C++ functions (like std::exp)?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61968>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Markus Mützel, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Markus Mützel, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Markus Mützel, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, John W. Eaton, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, John W. Eaton, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible,
Markus Mützel <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Markus Mützel, 2022/02/01
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2022/02/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2022/02/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Markus Mützel, 2022/02/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Markus Mützel, 2022/02/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2022/02/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, John W. Eaton, 2022/02/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, John W. Eaton, 2022/02/05
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Markus Mützel, 2022/02/06
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61968] pow2 with two arguments is not Matlab compatible, Markus Mützel, 2022/02/06