|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62212] Wrong unsigned integer overflow with clang |
Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:20:12 -0400 (EDT) |
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #62212 (project octave): For X > flintmax, I would expect X-1 == X. Don't we need to account for eps(X) here? I understand that my original assumption that X > intmax('UT') would work was wrong but I'm still not sure exactly how to perform this check "correctly". _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62212> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |