Re: Kind of a lookfor function (moved from help list)

[Keith Goodman]

Sorry. Poorly worded question. I too was asking John. I didn't want to
work on the doc string unless...

On 6/3/05, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Keith Goodman wrote:
> 
> >On 5/30/05, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In any case the reason for a proof-of-concept was to allow
> >>discussion, and see if and how this feature might be integrated.. Do you
> >>want it John?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >What's the status on adding a lookfor command? Do you want a doc string?
> >
> >
> >
> The status is that I don't want to write a function that won't be
> incorporated into octave so I'm waiting for John to bless the idea of a
> lookfor function, with the understanding that non texinfo help strings
> might cause problems in getting the first sentence for the lookfor function.
> 
> Yes write the doc string, one less thing that I'll have to do if John
> accepts the code...
> 
> Cheers
> David
> 
> --
> David Bateman                                address@hidden
> Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
> Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
> 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE
> 
> The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
> 
> [x] General Business Information
> [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
> [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
> 
>