[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: message ids for warnings and errors
From: |
Stefan van der Walt |
Subject: |
Re: message ids for warnings and errors |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:40:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:38:09PM -0500, Paul Kienzle wrote:
> The obvious way is to maintain a list of warning
> names and states for the current function context
> and run through this list when the function returns.
> This does mean the majority of functions have to
> pay for a feature they do not use, so not an ideal
> solution.
Would it be worthwhile to implement hash-tables in liboctave? That
way the performance hit needs to be minimal.
Stefan
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, (continued)
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, John W. Eaton, 2005/12/07
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, Quentin Spencer, 2005/12/06
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, John W. Eaton, 2005/12/06
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/12/07
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, John W. Eaton, 2005/12/07
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, Paul Kienzle, 2005/12/07
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, John W. Eaton, 2005/12/07
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, Paul Kienzle, 2005/12/07
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, John W. Eaton, 2005/12/07
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, Paul Kienzle, 2005/12/08
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors,
Stefan van der Walt <=
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, Paul Kienzle, 2005/12/09
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, Paul Kienzle, 2005/12/07
- Re: message ids for warnings and errors, John W. Eaton, 2005/12/07