octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Successful compilation with MinGW


From: David Bateman
Subject: Re: Successful compilation with MinGW
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:29:49 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Ole Jacob Hagen a écrit :

Hi.

What changes did you make to Makefiles and so on, to compile Octave with
MinGW/Msys?

How does a MinGW compiled Octave performs versus a Cygwin compiled
Octave with the same computer? And how does Octave compare with same
compiler on Linux?

There is a site with benchmark for Octave/Matlab...Don't remember where
I downloaded it...

www.sciviews.org, though this benchmark caused a lot of work in octave and so the results presented there are out of date.

I mangaged also to compile Octave with MinGW (GCC-3.2.3). I've also
benchmarked these Octave versions: MinGW octave and Cygwin Ocave.

The benchmark results can be found here:

MinGW GCC-3.2.3:
http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/octave-maintainers/2005/14
Cygwin GCC-3.2.3:
http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/octave-maintainers/2005/26

Can you do a benchmark test with the new gcc-version?

I'm not sure your benchmarks are fair, since you don't install either atlas or octave-forge, and I suspect FFTW either, under mingw. This can be seen in the relative values you give. The only benchmark value that I think is important in these in the Fibonacci test where cygwin wins, as this tests for-loops. Though this is with g++ 3.2 and the results would have been very different with a later compiler....

Regards
David

Cheers,

Ole J.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]