|
From: | David Bateman |
Subject: | Re: Successful compilation with MinGW |
Date: | Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:29:49 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
Ole Jacob Hagen a écrit :
www.sciviews.org, though this benchmark caused a lot of work in octave and so the results presented there are out of date.Hi. What changes did you make to Makefiles and so on, to compile Octave with MinGW/Msys? How does a MinGW compiled Octave performs versus a Cygwin compiled Octave with the same computer? And how does Octave compare with same compiler on Linux? There is a site with benchmark for Octave/Matlab...Don't remember where I downloaded it...
I'm not sure your benchmarks are fair, since you don't install either atlas or octave-forge, and I suspect FFTW either, under mingw. This can be seen in the relative values you give. The only benchmark value that I think is important in these in the Fibonacci test where cygwin wins, as this tests for-loops. Though this is with g++ 3.2 and the results would have been very different with a later compiler....I mangaged also to compile Octave with MinGW (GCC-3.2.3). I've also benchmarked these Octave versions: MinGW octave and Cygwin Ocave. The benchmark results can be found here: MinGW GCC-3.2.3: http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/octave-maintainers/2005/14 Cygwin GCC-3.2.3: http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/octave-maintainers/2005/26 Can you do a benchmark test with the new gcc-version?
Regards David
Cheers, Ole J.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |