Re: Is there anything else that should be fixed for 2.9.5 or 2.1.73?

[David Bateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:

>On 21-Mar-2006, David Bateman wrote:
>
>| John W. Eaton wrote:
>| 
>| >On 19-Mar-2006, David Bateman wrote:
>| >
>| >| 2) Add an argument to the solve code that is just there for the dmsolve 
>| >| function to prevent ::solve from recalling dmsolve. This is slightly 
>| >| ugly, but perhaps less than the above.
>| >
>| >Would this be the simplest thing to do until we can find a better
>| >solution?
>| >
>| >| 3) Try and rewrite the dmsolve template functions as a template class or 
>| >| as part of the SparseMatrix class itself. In the first case, the class  
>| >| can be made a friend of SparseMatrix and SpaseComplexMatrix,and the 
>| >| second it implicitly as access. This seems to be a relatively large 
>| >| change for limited gain, and I'm not sure that I can do it without code 
>| >| duplication, which was the reason to write the code as a template 
>| >| function in the first place.
>| >
>| >What are the problems with declaring the function as a friend?  Can
>| >you give a small example that shows what you want or what causes
>| >trouble?
>| >
>| >jwe
>| >
>| Ok, then what about the attached patch..
>
>Seems OK to me.  Please check it in, then I will make the 2.9.5
>snapshot.
>
>Thanks,
>
>jwe
>
>  
>
Ok, I committed this patch. Though can you consider the mingw/getrusage
patch I just sent? Also the mail from Wolfgang Lehrach about the
try/catch bug after a fortran error, should be considered prior to a
2.9.5 as I can confirm this behaviour..

D.

D.

-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary