[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: m file cache
From: |
Paul Billings |
Subject: |
RE: m file cache |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2006 15:17:43 -1000 |
Networked drives work (WinXP).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of Bill Denney
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:58 AM
> To: John W. Eaton
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: m file cache
>
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2006, John W. Eaton wrote:
>
> > Are there any widely used filesystems where the timestamp of a
> directory
> > does not change if a file is added to or removed from it? I
> think POSIX
> > filesystems (including NFS?) do update timestamps correctly,
> but I'm not
> > sure about Windows. What about network filesystems with Windows?
> > Samba?
>
> I'm not sure about networked drives, but regular directories work (I'd
> assume that samba would work the same way since it's just reporting what
> the directory reports).
>
> Bill
>
> --
> "It shows `us vs. them,' and I'm on the `us' side."
> -- Dan Quayle
- m file cache, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/04
- m file cache, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/24
- Re: m file cache, Bill Denney, 2006/05/24
- RE: m file cache,
Paul Billings <=
- RE: m file cache, Paul Billings, 2006/05/25
- RE: m file cache, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/26
- RE: m file cache, Søren Hauberg, 2006/05/27
- Re: m file cache, David Bateman, 2006/05/27
- Re: m file cache, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/27
- Re: m file cache, Søren Hauberg, 2006/05/27
- Re: m file cache, John W. Eaton, 2006/05/27