[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m
From: |
Joe Koski |
Subject: |
Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:50:37 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
on 8/21/06 12:07 PM, John W. Eaton at address@hidden wrote:
> On 21-Aug-2006, Joe Koski wrote:
>
> | on 8/21/06 11:10 AM, John W. Eaton at address@hidden wrote:
> |
> | > On 21-Aug-2006, Joe Koski wrote:
> | >
> | > | Now the only remaining error is
> | > |
> | > | test_io.m .............................................. PASS 65/66
> FAIL
> | > | 1
> | > |
> | > | which is unrelated to the sparse matrix package, and doesn't seem to
> affect
> | > | my day-to-day use of octave.
> | >
> | > Can you give some more details about this failure? What is in the log
> | > file for it?
> | >
> | > jwe
> |
> | John,
> |
> | In fntests.log, the following lines report the error:
> |
> | >>>>> processing test_io
> | ***** test
> |
> | [save_status, save_files] = testls (0);
> | [load_status, load_files] = testls (1);
> |
> | for f = [save_files, load_files]
> | unlink (f{1});
> | endfor
> |
> | assert(save_status && load_status);
> | !!!!! test failed
> | error: failed: mat5.mat int64
> |
> | Apparently related to 64 bit integers? Sorry, I don't know the status of Mac
> | support for 64 bit integers in OS X 10.4.7. I do know that they don't claim
> | full 64 bit support yet.
>
> Does OS X have 64-bit long long integers? Search for
> HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT=1 and SIZEOF_LONG_LONG=8 in the output from
> octave_config_info.
>
> jwe
John,
I searched octave_config_info. For HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT, there are two
instances of -DHAVE_LONG_LONG_INT=1 in UGLY_DEFS and DEFS. For
SIZEOF_LONG_LONG there are again two instances of -DSIZEOF_LONG_LONG=8 in
the same two variables (UGLY_DEFS and DEFS). Otherwise, the strings don't
occur.
In my config.log for octave-2.9.7, I have
#define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT 1
several times, and
#define SIZEOF_LONG_LONG 8
also several times.
So apparently, octave thinks that it has 64 bit integer support.
Joe
- Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m, (continued)
- Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m, John W. Eaton, 2006/08/21
- Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m,
Joe Koski <=
- RE: Seg fault with test_sparse.m, Joe Koski, 2006/08/21
- Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m, John W. Eaton, 2006/08/21
- FW: Seg fault with test_sparse.m, Joe Koski, 2006/08/21
- Re: Seg fault with test_sparse.m, David Bateman, 2006/08/22