[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Sep 2006 09:19:42 -0400 |
On 1-Sep-2006, David Bateman wrote:
| Thinking about this a bit more, the octave cellfun effectively assumes
| that "UniformOutput" is false and so all results are given in a cell
| array. "UniformOutput" being "true" equivalent in octave would be
|
| cell2mat(cellfun (@upper, {'f', 'o', 'o'}))
|
| So matlab just made the default output of cellfun different from octave
| so the output is incompatible. If we want to make cellfun compatible
| then the want we might do is make cell2mat and oct-file in cellfun.cc
| and call it on the outputs if "UniformOutput" is "true".
|
| I'll make a cellfun that is matlab compatible if you want it... I'll do
| it after work today...
Yes, if you have time and would like to do it that would be great.
Thanks,
jwe
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/03
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/05
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/07
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/12
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/12
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/12