|
From: | Søren Hauberg |
Subject: | Re: Octave Central (or something like that) |
Date: | Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:37:06 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070307) |
John W. Eaton skrev:
Basically I think it should look the same. I don't think it's clear that octave-forge is the "official" way of getting extra functionality. It's very clear to me that matlab central is the official way users can contribute to matlab (as much as you can contribute to a non-free project), but I don't get the same feel with octave-forge.On 9-Mar-2007, Søren Hauberg wrote:| I would prefer if we only had 1 site. Currently we have 2: octave.org | and octave.sf.net. Personally I think octave.org should host everything | that's currently on SF. I think that would make things easier for new users.Do you mean that it should all be accessible via some subdomain.octave.org address, or that it should all be hosted on the same system?
So I don't know exactly what I'm saying, but I think octave and octave-forge (and octave central if that'll ever exist) should be more tied together.
SørenP.S. Sorry for not being very clear here, but my mind just isn't very clear on this topic...
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |