octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.9.11?


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: 2.9.11?
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:00:07 -0400

On 19-Apr-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:

| On 4/19/07, Thomas Weber <address@hidden> wrote:
| > Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 09:47 schrieb Michael Goffioul:
| > > 2) "configure" script must be called with additional settings, to 
correctly
| > > define compiler; the command should looks like:
| >
| > > CC=cc-msvc CXX=cc-msvc AR=ar-msvc RANLIB=ranlib-msvc ./configure
| > > Would it be OK to use octave_config_info('config_opts') to achieve this?
| > > (I mean, is it OK for other platforms?)
| >
| > This is an issue we are facing in Debian as well: how to pass additional 
flags
| > to the configure script. Did you hardcode your changes into pkg.m?
| 
| For the time being, yes. But I could probably also use:
| 
|    system(['cd src; ./configure ', octave_config_info('config_opts')]);
| 
| although I didn't test it yet. But the point here is that I want to use the
| same flags as those used to compile octave itself. Adding *new* flags
| is something different.

Shouldn't an Octave package use mkoctfile to compile things?  Aren't
the compiler options recorded in mkoctfile?

jwe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]