octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Octave reputation


From: Søren Hauberg
Subject: Octave reputation
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:25:31 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604)

Hi,
I was just talking to one of my professors about how much more wonderful Octave is compared to Matlab. And he made the following statements against octave:

1) Octave isn't developed any more.
2) Octave doesn't have any of the toolboxes that matlab has.

Now both of these statements are completely wrong which I told him, but that's not the point. The point is that people (I've heard these arguments several times before) _think_ these statements are correct. I'm guessing that statement 1 is because there hasn't been a stable release in years. Octave 3.0 will fix that (yay!).
  I don't really know why Octave-forge is unknown.
Anyway, I'm writing this mail to ask how we should avoid people making these statements in the future? The way I see it, we should

1) Have stable releases more often (after 3.0 of course).
2) Put more visible links to Octave-Forge on the Octave website.

Anyway, I just want to let out some steam. I get really annoyed when people avoid Octave simply because of its reputation.

Søren


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]