[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: goals for 3.1
From: |
Driss GHADDAB |
Subject: |
Re: goals for 3.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:27:30 +0100 |
Le Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:53:52 +0100,
David Bateman <address@hidden> a écrit :
> David Bateman wrote:
> > I can't generate these failures, but I've moved on since and have
> > eliminated all but splu of the dispatched sparse functions. So
> > perhaps I fixed the issue during that process. Can you wait till I
> > also get rid of splu and I send an additional patch and see if that
> > fixes it?
Yes, I also saw these failures (Mercurial changeset 7574:056361172821
+ Ben Abott polyfit patch) (FAIL count 8).
> Ok here is the patch that eliminates the rest of the dispatched sparse
> functions. It also should fix the bug you saw John.
After patching with this patch, FAIL count is again 0.
Regards,
--
Driss GHADDAB <address@hidden>
- Re: goals for 3.1, (continued)
- Re: goals for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/19
- Re: goals for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/20
- Re: goals for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/20
- Re: goals for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/20
- Re: goals for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/20
- Re: goals for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/20
- Re: goals for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/20
- Re: goals for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/21
- Re: goals for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/22
- Re: goals for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/22
- Re: goals for 3.1,
Driss GHADDAB <=
- Re: goals for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/20