[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.1 release?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0.1 release? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:06:11 +0200 |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:01 PM, David Bateman
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I just looked at this issue a little bit and the failing part of the
> code is
>
> Bmax = bitmax;
> A = bitshift(Bmax,-2);
> bitxor(cast(A,'uint64'),cast(Bmax,'uint64'))
>
> Bmax is '2^53 - 1' and A is '2^51 - 1" and so bitxor of the above should
> be '2^52 + 2^51' and is under linux. Under windows this appears to
> return '2^53 + 2^51' which is of course a bug.. The equivalent in C++
> would be
>
> 0x000FFFFFFFFFFFFFUL^ x0003FFFFFFFFFFFFUL
>
> so what does this return when compiled with MSVC in C++ mode? If its not
> '2^52 + 2^51' its time to file a bug report against MSVC..
Could you provide some code that I can compile and run out-of-the-box?
I'm not sure I fully understand the problem...
Michael.
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, (continued)
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (cygwin), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?,
Michael Goffioul <=
- RE: 3.0.1 release?, Bateman David-ADB014, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/09
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/09