[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:19:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On 29/07/08 16:54 -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 29-Jul-2008, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
> | Thomas Weber has already agreed to host the release repos, but he
> | suggested to use a single repo with branches instead. (Did you get a
> | Cc?) The reasoning seems valid to me. Unless you have
> | counter-arguments, I'll go ahead and dive into it.
>
> I think a separate archive for each 3.0.x release is not necessary,
> but since the branch point for each new stable series (3.0.x, 3.2.x,
> etc.) will be different, I don't see the point of having a single
> archive for each of those. I don't plan to have these branches in my
> archive (as the release-3-0-x branch is now) because it doesn't seem
> to be of much help. But since you will be the one dealing with the
> archive(s), it is up to you how you organize it (them).
Okay, to ensure that we are all talking about the same thing:
I understood Jaroslav as follows: he wants a new repository for each 3.0.x
series, ie we have repositories:
octave-3.0.2
octave-3.0.3
...
I think that would be overkill because as soon as a version is released,
nothing is going to happen in that specific repository anymore. And as
octave-3.0.3 would be a clone from octave-3.0.2 anyways, it seems simpler to
me to use just one repository octave-3.0.x and tag release in there.
I don't think that repository should contain 3.2 stuff, in fact if we come to
releases for the 3.2 series, a separate repository might be in order.
Thomas
- Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, (continued)
- Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, David Bateman, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, Søren Hauberg, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, David Bateman, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, Søren Hauberg, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, dbateman, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes,
Thomas Weber <=
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/30
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, Thomas Weber, 2008/07/29