Re: checked int-int conversions

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:02 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 30-Jul-2008, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
> | A good idea - I forgot to check the Matlab counterparts. Should I
> | resubmit the patch (given that this is, as I understand, a trivial
> | change)?
>
> I've already checked it in to my archive, so I'll fix it up.  It
> should be pushed to the public archive soon.
>
> I'm also eliminating the trunc_flag thing in favor of passing an
> additional argument by reference to the constructor.  To me, the extra
> argument seems better than having a static data member for this purpose.
>

It occured to me, but it doesn't seem so nice - the xtra argument
needs to be propagated through a lot of function calls. Perhaps you'll
find a better solution.

> jwe
>



-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz