|
From: | David Bateman |
Subject: | Re: stem series objects |
Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:50:57 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080725) |
Michael Goffioul wrote:
This is the change I in fact made in my original changeset.. So this should be left alone.On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:3) the off-by-1 error was intentional. In Matlab, callbacks are always called with at least 2 arguments: the handle of the object and an optional data specific to the event (for instance, a keypress event will contain information about the key pressed). Then other possible arguments are appended, in case the callback has the form address@hidden, p1, p2, ...}yes, but then I saw that the function call had to have the form function fun (h, d, f, p1, p2) rather than function fun (h, d, p1, p2) as I would have expected from the documentation. Are you sure of your explanation? In any case I left my change to this in for now.OK, I found the error: the starting index of the for-loop should be 1 instead of 0. The 2-offset for args should be left untouched. Can you fix it? Michael.
D. -- David Bateman address@hiddenMotorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |