[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Objects and OOP
From: |
Ryan Rusaw |
Subject: |
Re: Objects and OOP |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:01:41 -0600 |
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Michael Goffioul
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:02 PM, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Sure, I believe the OOP features already do what John wants so I don't think
>> he'll do the rest. However, you might prefer to look at the classdef support
>> rather than inheritance in the older OOP code. I believe Michael Goffioul
>> send some code with the start of this in November..
>
> Nothing functional, I'm afraid. It was basically a skeleton implementing
> meta-object protocol. I didn't have time to continue further yet.
>
> Michael.
>
I had some idle time over my 2 weeks off for the winter holiday
season, so I added classdef support to the parser and lexer as well as
preliminary +package directory support.
I've only just started the work on fleshing out Michael's meta-object
code and integrating it with the parser though, so it's far from being
complete as well.
Ryan
Objects and OOP, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/27