[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser)
From: |
Przemek Klosowski |
Subject: |
Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser) |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:50:02 -0500 (EST) |
John asked:
Does XML do a good job for large amounts of binary data (like a large
double precision floating point array, which is something that is
common in Octave)? If not, then I'm not sure it's really a good choice.
We can always pull a Microsoft, and write base64-encoded opaque data
in XML. Several different opaqueness levels might be:
- direct dump of the in-memory octave data object
<octaveData content="ab1231aef498....500MB of hex..1389"/>
- encoding of the disk octave file format
- something more non-octave-specific like:
<octaveArray
name="mydata"
type="double"
dimension="3"
size="11 12 13"
encoding="base64">
c452ca6a0901231130v6c3a1e22y441a6596e6063cb6
128f38bd0811251501p4ed6d20do5c43863caa75aa72
</octaveArray>
The large array read/write speed of all those choices should be about
the same.
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), (continued)
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), Ryan Rusaw, 2009/01/26
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), Pedro L. Lucas, 2009/01/26
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/26
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), Pedro L. Lucas, 2009/01/27
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2009/01/27
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), John W. Eaton, 2009/01/27
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/01/28
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), Olaf Till, 2009/01/28
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), John Swensen, 2009/01/28
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser), Pedro L. Lucas, 2009/01/29
- Re: GUI work (was: Graphical help browser),
Przemek Klosowski <=