[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About diagonal matrices
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: About diagonal matrices |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:44:28 +0100 |
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:15 PM, dbateman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> the goal of this patch was just to get the right behavior of scalar times
> sparse matrix wrt the type. That is it returns a sparse matrix rather than
> a full ones. The changes Jaroslav made to the mappers and operators changed
> the behavior of 0/0 however
>
But what changes? I'm not aware of any changes I did to change
behaviour of sparse matrices.
If you know of a revision, either in 3-0-x or development archives,
where NaN * speye (3) returned a matrix filled with NaNs, please tell
me its number. Chances are that I unintentionally broke something,
though I hope not to.
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- Re: About diagonal matrices, (continued)
- Re: About diagonal matrices, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/21
- Re: About diagonal matrices, Søren Hauberg, 2009/02/21
- Re: About diagonal matrices, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/21
- Re: About diagonal matrices, John W. Eaton, 2009/02/21
- Re: About diagonal matrices, John W. Eaton, 2009/02/21
- Re: About diagonal matrices, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: About diagonal matrices, dbateman, 2009/02/25
- Re: About diagonal matrices,
Jaroslav Hajek <=
- Re: About diagonal matrices, dbateman, 2009/02/25
- Re: About diagonal matrices, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/26
- Re: About diagonal matrices, John W. Eaton, 2009/02/26
- Re: About diagonal matrices, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/26
Re: About diagonal matrices, Daniel J Sebald, 2009/02/20
Re: About diagonal matrices, Daniel J Sebald, 2009/02/20