Re: OOP load update

[Robert T. Short]

I am probably confused now.  The "real" patch is the one you checked in 
through Savannah.  I used the other one a little bit, but that was the 
period I was traveling and had no time to do this so I never got very 
far with it.  Thus when I saw you had checked in the exemplar stuff I 
grabbed it and ran with it.  Don't think I ever really got back to 
looking at the other patch again so I probably didn't really use it as a 
basis for anything.  I will take another look at it. 


John W. Eaton wrote:
> On  6-May-2009, Robert T. Short wrote:
>
> | I lied.  I do remember this patch, and used it until you posted the 
> | "real" patch.
>
> What do you mean by "real" patch?
>
> The one I checked in:
>
>   http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/d8f9588c6ba1
>
> is not the same as the one that appears in the attachment of the
> message:
>
>   
> https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-April/012050.html
>
> an earlier version of which appears here:
>
>   
> https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-April/012019.html
>
> The patches that I posted as attachments are for loading objects from
> files.  That's why I thought you used them as the basis for your
> recent patch.
>
> The patch that I checked in just added the exemplar infrastructure,
> and used it in the class constructor to ensure that all objects of a
> given class have the same layout as the first one that is constructed.
>
> jwe
>
>
>