[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: extra F on function names
From: |
Marco Atzeri |
Subject: |
Re: extra F on function names |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:07:49 +0000 (GMT) |
--- Mer 25/11/09, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> ha scritto:
> Da: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
> Oggetto: Re: extra F on function names
> A: "Marco Atzeri" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "octave maintainers mailing list" <address@hidden>
> Data: Mercoledì 25 novembre 2009, 21:20
> On 24-Nov-2009, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> | unfortunately the patch is not enough
> |
> | /pub/hg/octave_build/src/builtins.cc:942: undefined
> reference to `F__contourc__(octave_value_list const&,
> int)'
> | .libs/liboctinterp_la-builtins.o: In function
> `install___convn___fcns':
> | /pub/hg/octave_build/src/builtins.cc:950: undefined
> reference to `F__convn__(octave_value_list const&,
> int)'
> | .libs/liboctinterp_la-builtins.o: In function
> `install___delaunayn___fcns':
> | /pub/hg/octave_build/src/builtins.cc:958: undefined
> reference to `F__delaunayn__(octave_value_list const&,
> int)'
> | .libs/liboctinterp_la-builtins.o: In function
> `install___dsearchn___fcns':
> | /pub/hg/octave_build/src/builtins.cc:966: undefined
> reference to `F__dsearchn__(octave_value_list const&,
> int)'
> | .libs/liboctinterp_la-builtins.o: In function
> `install___glpk___fcns':
> | /pub/hg/octave_build/src/builtins.cc:974: undefined
> reference to `F__glpk__(octave_value_list const&, int)'
> | .libs/liboctinterp_la-builtins.o: In function
> `install___lin_interpn___fcns':
> | /pub/hg/octave_build/src/builtins.cc:982: undefined
> reference to `F__lin_interpn__(octave_value_list const&,
> int)'
> | .libs/liboctinterp_la-builtins.o: In function
> `install___magick_read___fcns':
> | /pub/hg/octave_build/src/builtins.cc:990: undefined
> reference to `F__magick_read__(octave_value_list const&,
> int)'
>
> This shows that at least some of the DLD-FUNCTIONS files
> are still
> being included in the genreated src/builtins.cc file.
> Did you remove
> the builtins.cc file after applying the patch? Were
> the Makefiles
> properly regenerated when you ran make again?
>
> In any case, the patch I pointed you to was just a
> workaround, not a
> complete fix.
>
> jwe
>
Hi John,
as I am not very familiar with the builtins.cc
structure so I am trying to compare
3.2.3 version with the current one.
I see no big differences in the two builtins.cc,
but I found a difference on config.h
on 3.2.3
#define ENABLE_DYNAMIC_LINKING 1
while on current
/* #undef ENABLE_DYNAMIC_LINKING */
Is this a potential root cause of the problem ?
Thanks
Marco
- Re: extra F on function names,
Marco Atzeri <=