[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
safer way to use gnulib
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
safer way to use gnulib |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:49:20 -0500 |
On 20-Feb-2010, John W. Eaton wrote:
| On 20-Feb-2010, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
|
| | What do you think? It seems that in the current state of affairs
| | gnulib actually makes Octave less portable than before.
|
| Please see the following thread on the gnulib mailing list:
|
| http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-02/msg00113.html
|
| The last method proposed in that thread would allow us to use gnulib
| without having to modify Octave, and it would avoid the problems we
| have with the rpl_ definitions.
Looking at the thread in the archive, I realize that it may be a bit
confusing to know precisely which messages I'm talking about here.
The "last method proposed" is here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-02/msg00142.html
and Bruno Haible's response is here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-02/msg00143.html
jwe