|
From: | Michael D Godfrey |
Subject: | Re: fltk printing |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:16:53 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5 |
On 07/20/2010 11:44 AM, Shai Ayal wrote:
OK, assuming by "postscript" you mean EPS. In any case, aThe fltk backend can only produce postscript (although the library we are using, gl2ps can also produce PDF and latex), __ghostscript__print.m script seems right. As a somewhat related remark: there seems to be some uncertainty about BoundingBox in pdf. Ghostscript, which some view as pretty "official," does not write a %%BoundingBox into the pdf that it generates, nor does it appear to write a \BBox. This has the effect that pdftex does not accept the pdf using its \includegraphics{} call. Do you know if gl2ps handles the BoundingBox information differently? Or, do you know the officially correct position about BoundingBox information in pdf? I believe that the current pdftex \includegraphics handling is incorrect, but it is relatively hard to communicate with the texlive/pdftex folks these days. (They still live in the world where all package information starts with "download the source tar file and manually configure for your machine and needs...".) And, the current release of TexLive is causing people a lot of problems that are more important than the BoundingBox issue. Michael |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |