[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UIControl draft implementation
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: UIControl draft implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:01:44 +0000 |
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:11 PM, John Swensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Michael Goffioul wrote:
> I looked over this patch, but before I patch and build, I have a few
> questions:
> 1) How does this mesh with the recent discussion and work done to make uimenu
> work with the FLTK backend? Is there some duplicate work, or conflicting
> portions of the two implementations? It seems that the patch you are
> proposing is quite generic and intended to work with any backend?
This patch is backend-agnostic. It implements the low-level stuff required
at octave level. In that sense, it's independent of the uimenu stuff (though
I didn't check, maybe some code could be shared).
> 2) How does one go about testing this patch without a backend that implements
> these ui* objects? Do you have a "fake" backend that lets you simulate events
> for calling back into octave from the backend?
No, but in your case, I'll be able to provide you with my GTK+ test
implementation.
Michael.