[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch for gamma test
|
From: |
Marco Atzeri |
|
Subject: |
Re: patch for gamma test |
|
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 21:30:56 +0000 (GMT) |
--- Mar 16/11/10, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> ha scritto:
>
> On Nov 16, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> > --- Mar 16/11/10, Ben Abbott ha scritto:
> >
> >> Data: Martedì 16 novembre 2010, 15:27
> >> On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Marco
> >> Atzeri wrote:
> >>
> >>> As discussed on
> >>>
> >>> https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2010-October/017501.html
> >>>
> >>> this changeset amend the expectation from
> >>>
> >>> gamma(-1)= NaN
> >>> to
> >>> gamma(-1)= Inf
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Marco
> >>>
> >>> <gamma.patch>
> >>
> >> Matlab agrees that gamma(-1) is Inf, not NaN.
> >>
> >> Octave gives NaN for me. Should the sources
> be fixed
> >> to return the proper result?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >>
> >
> > I presume it is system dependent.
> > On cygwin gamma(-1)= Inf
> >
> > which system are you running ?
> >
> > Marco
>
> I'm running MacOS 10.6.5.
>
> Ben
>
Could you check if this patch solve the discrepancy ?
Marco
gamma_2.patch
Description: Text Data