[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better name for ROADMAP?
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: Better name for ROADMAP? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:53:46 -0800 |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 10-Jan-2011, Rik wrote:
>
> | I just updated the file ROADMAP in the toplevel directory which is a guide
> | to the directory structure of the source code. Is there a better name than
> | ROADMAP which makes me think that this is a list of goals for future
> releases?
>
> How about merging it with the HACKING file?
And what about README.devel? Should all 3 files be merged into a guide on
working with the raw source code? Or are the development releases such as
3.3.54 different enough (no requirement for gnulib, Mercurial) that they
get their own file.
--Rik