[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching for release?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: branching for release? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:44:53 -0500 |
On 19-Jan-2011, Judd Storrs wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, logari81 <address@hidden> wrote:
|
| Concerning the replacement of "backend" I don't have any fixed opinion.
| Concerning replacing "fltk" I would vote against "fltk_opengl", I would
| prefer one of "fltk" or "opengl".
|
|
| I imagine external graphical interfaces would use also use their own names.
| So, I propose:
|
| backend -> "graphics"
| fltk -> "internal"
We might eventually use gtk or qt in addition to fltk. Which one
would be "internal"?
jwe
- branching for release?, John W. Eaton, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?, logari81, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Judd Storrs, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Judd Storrs, 2011/01/19
- renaming "backend" (was: Re: branching for release?), John W. Eaton, 2011/01/20
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/20
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/20
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/21
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21