Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge bugs in the tracker?

[Carnë Draug]

2011/8/1 Philip Nienhuis <address@hidden>:
> Lastly I'm fairly happy with the -let's say: fairly relaxed- svn setup of
> OF.
> I find the stricter workflow of Mercurial a bit daunting (although I do
> understand very well why that is essential for core Octave). I hope that
> combining the bug trackers won't be a first step to moving all OF stuff to
> Mercurial too, sooner or later.
> IMO SVN suits fairly small projects like the individual OF packages very
> well.

Hi,

on this point I'd just like to point out that if we do end up moving
to savannah, this doesn't necessarily means replacing subversion by
mercurial. Savannah supports GNU Arch, GNU Bazaar, CVS, Git, Mercurial
and Subversion ( http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/WhyChooseSavannah
).

Carnë