[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Qhull 2012.1 questions
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: Qhull 2012.1 questions |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:06:12 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
--- On Fri, 2012/2/10, Brad Barber wrote:
> 7) Keep libqhullstatic.a. Marco prefers 'libqhull.a' and
> CLEAN_DIRECT_OUTPUT. Using libqhullstatic.a avoids conflicts between
> libqhull.a and libqhull.so. Renaming libqhull.so to libqhull-6.so would
> remove this conflict. Does anyone else prefer libqhull.a?
>
> 8) Continue to build the qhull executables as static builds. It makes them
> standalone and simplifies moving them elsewhere.
In MinGW convention, for example, libfoo.a is a static library and libfoo.dll.a
is a library for dynamic build.
Therefore from the MinGW point of view, libqhull.a is preferable.
Regards
Tatsuro
Regard