[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:29:31 +0000 |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Ben,
>>>
>>> Could you try with the proposed patch here
>>> (https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2011-December/025995.html)
>>> + your change in update_units() ?
>>>
>>> The patch above is a more accurate way of handling things.
>>>
>>> Michael.
>>
>> Thanks Michael !
>>
>> I'll do some testing (jwe's example on MacOS and Ubuntu) and push the change
>> later today.
>>
>> Ben
>
>
> Everything works for me under MacOS X, and I was able to duplicate the
> problem jwe encountered with mtex and can confirm this changeset works
> correctly.
>
> It also resolves the problem reported in bug 34720.
>
> Although, I've been unable get the mtex toolbox to run under Ubuntu, I'm
> confident the changeset is working correctly, so I've pushed it.
>
> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/ba01a38bc5c1
Excellent. Thanks, Ben.
Michael.