[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ? |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:43:54 -0400 |
On 16-Feb-2012, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
| >>> Ben,
| >>>
| >>> Could you try with the proposed patch here
| >>>
(https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2011-December/025995.html)
| >>> + your change in update_units() ?
| >>>
| >>> The patch above is a more accurate way of handling things.
| >>>
| >>> Michael.
| >>
| >> Thanks Michael !
| >>
| >> I'll do some testing (jwe's example on MacOS and Ubuntu) and push the
change later today.
| >>
| >> Ben
| >
| >
| > Everything works for me under MacOS X, and I was able to duplicate the
problem jwe encountered with mtex and can confirm this changeset works
correctly.
| >
| > It also resolves the problem reported in bug 34720.
| >
| > Although, I've been unable get the mtex toolbox to run under Ubuntu, I'm
confident the changeset is working correctly, so I've pushed it.
| >
| > http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/ba01a38bc5c1
|
| Excellent. Thanks, Ben.
Yes, thanks for taking care of this problem.
jwe
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?,
John W. Eaton <=