octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:43:54 -0400

On 16-Feb-2012, Michael Goffioul wrote:

| On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
| >>> Ben,
| >>>
| >>> Could you try with the proposed patch here
| >>> 
(https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2011-December/025995.html)
| >>> + your change in update_units() ?
| >>>
| >>> The patch above is a more accurate way of handling things.
| >>>
| >>> Michael.
| >>
| >> Thanks Michael !
| >>
| >> I'll do some testing (jwe's example on MacOS and Ubuntu) and push the 
change later today.
| >>
| >> Ben
| >
| >
| > Everything works for me under MacOS X, and I was able to duplicate the 
problem jwe encountered with mtex and can confirm this changeset works 
correctly.
| >
| > It also resolves the problem reported in bug 34720.
| >
| > Although, I've been unable get the mtex toolbox to run under Ubuntu, I'm 
confident the changeset is working correctly, so I've pushed it.
| >
| >        http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/ba01a38bc5c1
| 
| Excellent. Thanks, Ben.

Yes, thanks for taking care of this problem.

jwe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]