[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal for new m-file function
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: proposal for new m-file function |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:39:47 -0400 |
On Mar 26, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2012, at 9:53 AM, c. wrote:
>
>> On 26 Mar 2012, at 15:23, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>
>>> I've replied and mentioned our concerns about the terms of use, and linked
>>> to the parts that are worrisome for us.
>> As far as I understand if he could just send the file via email to the list
>> it would be OK for us to use it, right?
>> c.
>
> Jonas has emailed me the files (he is also cc'd on this email).
>
> I'll start working on a changeset, which will include tests. demos, and the
> tex-info documentation.
>
> Ben
The changeset is attached. I'll give a day for comments, and then push.
Ben
changeset.patch
Description: Binary data
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, (continued)
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/23
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Martin Helm, 2012/03/23
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/24
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/25
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, c., 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, c., 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Martin Helm, 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/29