octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cuddled / non-cuddled parenthesis convention


From: Rik
Subject: Cuddled / non-cuddled parenthesis convention
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:12:08 -0700

7/6/12

John,

I'm working on some code maintenance issues.  As I recall, the preferred
convention for parenthesis is that they be cuddled with the preceding word
when indexing is being performed, but separated by a space if it is a
function call.  I just committed a changeset to modify uses of "retval (0)
= xxx" to "retval(0) = xxx".  I'm considering looking for more of these
parenthesis coding convention mistakes.

For example, from balance.cc I have

balance.cc:107:  if (nn != args(0).columns())
balance.cc:114:    (! AEPcase && args(1).is_single_type());

which I think should have a space to indicate a function call.

balance.cc:107:  if (nn != args(0).columns ())
balance.cc:114:    (! AEPcase && args(1).is_single_type ());

Is that right?

--Rik


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]