Re: Compatability and an engineer's perspective

[Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso]

On 16 July 2012 04:49, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Il giorno 16/lug/2012, alle ore 10.03, address@hidden ha scritto:
>
>>> So, when I can take the Signal Processing Toolbox from Octave and run it
>>> in MATLAB it allows me to prove (in a more credible way) that Octave is a
>>> sound alternative.
>>>
>>
>> You shouldn't have to run Matlab to prove that Octave is a sound
>> alternative. You should run Octave instead.
>
> Indeed, I believe the correct approach to advocate Octave would be to
> get your company's application to run on Octave + signal package rather
> than porting the signal package to Matlab.

Porting the signal package to Matlab would also involve rewrting all
the C++ calling the Octave API to C code calling the MEX API. Ewwww...

- Jordi G. H.