On 09/10/2012 12:50 PM, address@hidden wrote:
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:34:17 +0200
From: Philip Nienhuis<address@hidden>
To: Max Brister<address@hidden>
Cc: Philip Nienhuis<address@hidden>,
address@hidden
Subject: Re: LLVM not picked up - too old version?
Message-ID:<address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Max Brister wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Philip Nienhuis
<address@hidden> wrote:
What version of LLVM is needed these days?
I have llvm 3.0; configure output at the end doesn't mention the
llvm
libs/flags/include but only says something like:
"JIT compiler for loops: false"
AFAICR a week or two weeks ago it did pick up the llvm stuff
(that is, I saw
the llvm libs/include/flags mentioned in configure's output).
linux Mageia 2, gcc 4.6.3, Pentium M
Philip
LLVM 3.0 should still work, I haven't tested it recently though.
Recently there was a change that requires "--enable-jit" in order for
JIT to be enabled.
Thanks, yes --enable-jit=yes did the trick.
I must have missed that announcement somehow.
BTW I now see messages (using sources updated two hours ago):
"cc1plus: warning: /usr/bin/llvm-config: not a directory {enabled by
default]"
repeated twice after every compile step. Should I start worrying?
Yes. That is unlikely to work. We can wait until the end of the compile,
but I think I want to see your config.log file.