[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: ML2012b [WAS: Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000]
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: OT: ML2012b [WAS: Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000] |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:08:59 -0400 |
On 12 September 2012 19:44, Philip Nienhuis <address@hidden> wrote:
> I do hope that Octave will also have classdef some day - not that I'm very
> fond of it but this ML incompatibility simply hit me (and OO/classdef proved
> a godsend for this particular application).
You do know about the classdef branch, right?
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, (continued)
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Michael D Godfrey, 2012/09/11
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Michael D Godfrey, 2012/09/11
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/09/11
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, John W. Eaton, 2012/09/12
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Michael D Godfrey, 2012/09/12
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, John W. Eaton, 2012/09/12
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Michael D Godfrey, 2012/09/12
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Philip Nienhuis, 2012/09/12
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Michael D Godfrey, 2012/09/12
- OT: ML2012b [WAS: Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000], Philip Nienhuis, 2012/09/12
- Re: OT: ML2012b [WAS: Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000],
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/09/12
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2012/09/12
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/09/12
- Re: imag () function detail regarding -0.0000, Michael D Godfrey, 2012/09/11