Re: Octave-maintainers Digest, Vol 84, Issue 21

[Daniel J Sebald]

On 03/09/2013 07:47 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:

> I'd have written a changeset but I don't know what we want to do. We
> could make the easy change
>
> // Number of history lines to show
> int limit = -50;
>
> or similar and see if
>
> hlist = command_history::list (limit, numbered_output);
>
> does the proper boundary checking (i.e., if limit is actually bigger
> than the list, there is no segmentation fault).

This apparently is the case.  I type "history 2000" for a 1010 length 
list and there seems to be no problem.

Dan

PS: Is there no way to clear the history?